SPORTS  |  LIFESTYLE  |  ATTITUDE  |  AUTHENTIC
YDKJ
  • HOME
  • About
  • Contact
  • Photos

College Football  |  Guess everyone forgot about Florida

9/30/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
Just look at Florida.

If ever a program symbolized the ever-changing landscape of college football, where perception and reality, quite possibly, may never shall meet, it is the Gators.

Think about it. If you’re, say, over the age of 10, and you follow the sport, did you ever imagine the day that it would take a 4-0 start for Florida to finally crack the top 25 ... in the last spot available to boot?

Seriously. I mean, c’mon, this was an outfit that won back-to-back national titles within the last decade, was the standard-bearer for excellence in the country’s best conference pretty much throughout the 1990s and 2000s, had produced NFL players by the dozens during that time, and, as recently as 2012, had posted an 11-win season that yielded a final ranking inside the top 10 … and it actually had to prove itself entire first month of the season before even getting a sniff of respect?

Wow.

​Not sure if I’m more stunned by the unbeaten starts by the likes of Northwestern, Indiana and Temple, the 1-3 disaster that is Arkansas (yep, I was on board that poorly built bandwagon) or the lack of any leeway for the Gators and their not-so-long-ago greatness.

Granted, Will Muschamp did a masterful job of deconstructing the dynastic entity that Urban Meyer had near-perfected in Gainesville.

​Meyer merely had taken the ashes-to-awesome program created by Florida legend Steve Spurrier to another level, you know, before taking a “leave of absence” for health reasons that conveniently concealed an actual bolting to Ohio State, where he’s already won another national title.

It only took Muschamp, an emotions-on-your-sleeve kinda coach, two years to erase the “great” from the Gators, not to mention, apparently, any cachet that had been built up by Spurrier and Meyer. His 2013 campaign, which saw Florida lose its final seven games, was the worst by the program since 1979.

Not even the immortal Ron Zook had that kind of deathly touch, as his three-year hiccup between Spurrier and Meyer still yielded three ranked teams … and, frankly, recruiting classes that helped spark Meyer’s immediate success.

Still, I wasn’t prepared for Florida having to beat East Carolina, Kentucky and Tennessee in succession the last three weeks before even getting a sniff from pollsters. It’s not like the Gators are lacking in talent.

They still rank among the country’s best every year in recruiting. Running back Kelvin “Son of Fred” Taylor is quality, quarterback Will Grier shows serious flashes and defensive tackle Jonathan Bullard leads the NCAA in tackles for loss.

Also, their new head coach, Jim McElwain, not only gets Florida away from the Muschamp era, but brings some serious credentials, having served as offensive coordinator on two national title teams at Alabama before taking over at Colorado State and making it relevant outside of Fort Collins – which is not the easiest of tasks.

The Gators, going off the predictions of most experts, were underdogs against both Kentucky and Tennessee, and they hosted the latter at the Swamp.

Huh?!! It’s, like, did ya ever?

Here’s the ironic beauty about all of this: Despite the universal downplay about their prospects coming into the season carrying well into it, the Gators, today, stand in perfect position to jump right back into the elite fray.
No. 3 Mississippi comes to town this weekend.

​Win that, and all bets are off for those who assumed Florida’s turnaround would take a significant amount of time.

​Frankly, win that, and the Gators surpass Michigan as the most unlikely rapid “rising from the dead” act thus far this season.

They’d still have to face three more highly ranked teams, including No. 9 Louisiana State with Heisman frontrunner Leonard Fournette, after that.

But, geez, how soon we forgot just how good Florida was … and can be.

- Jack Kerwin  |  ydkjack1@gmail.com

Picture

AROUND THE NATION

COMING OF AGE: Obviously, we’re all dropping jaws at the exploits and explosiveness of the manchild that is Leonard Fournette as he carries No. 9 Louisiana State ever closer to playoff contention with each passing week. There is no denying his greatness with running the ball, and running over and right by defenders. But, frankly, it was expected. The 6-foot-1, 230-pounder was, after all, the top recruit in the country when he signed with the Tigers.

Nothing of the sort could be said for the nation’s sack leader, Carl Nassib of Penn State (No. 95 pictured above). Oh, the name may have been known, mostly due to his brother, Ryan, quarterbacking Syracuse a few years ago and being drafted by the New York Giants. But Carl Nassib wasn’t a big-time recruit and, in fact, was a walk-on when he first arrived at State College.

After redshirting, he saw no action as a freshman. A year later, he made 12 tackles in 10 games. Last season, as a junior, just seven tackles in 13 games. He had a single sack in each of those campaigns. Clearly, not the stuff of legend … and certainly not an indication of what was about to come in 2015.

Now, fully grown into his 6-foot-7 frame, the tireless worker now weighs 272 pounds and is seeing the fruits of his labor pay off – to the tune of seven sacks in just four games. Even in the Nittany Lions’ lone loss, a gut-wrenching, image-busting, 27-10 loss at widely thought-to-be lightweight Temple, Nassib was dominant, registering a game-high 10 tackles, including a sack. He’s had at least one sack every game this season, including three against Buffalo to help kickstart PSU’s resurgence back to respectability.

Toss in an interception against Buffalo as well, and you can see why the defensive end now has piqued the interests of NFL player personnel people now – which is a major change from where he was as recently as last season.

MOST IMPRESSIVE: As far as teams go, several have left their mark, either unexpected or not, in the early part of the season. UCLA, Michigan State, Ole Miss, LSU, Northwestern, injury-plagued Notre Dame. You name it, they’ve done it, and done it in impressive fashion, no matter what you define as impressive. Sorry, Ohio State fans, your Buckeyes have not. The most impressive, though, throughout has been Utah. After ruining Jim Harbaugh’s debut as Michigan head coach to open the season, the 10th-ranked Utes have handled the likes of Utah State and Fresno State before completely dismantling then-No. 13 Oregon on the road, 62-20, this past weekend. That’s the same group of Ducks that Michigan State beat three weeks ago to vault into the No. 2 spot in the polls.

BANG FOR YOUR BUCK: The Pac-12 matchup at Stanford Stadium Saturday night pitting previously ranked Arizona against the host Cardinal may turn out to be the best game of the weekend … and, currently, tickets are going for $12 on StubHub. Really? Yep, really. It’s hard to believe. Apparently, only presently ranked teams, or Notre Dame, are cause for fans in one of the most deep-pocketed areas of the country to shell out a few extra bucks.
0 Comments

NFL  |  Rodgers always had the right stuff

9/29/2015

0 Comments

 

​PHILLY PHILE

Picture
His greatness was preordained.

Or, at least, that’s how it was pitched by many. He had the pedigree, the talent, the chutzpah, the arm and the accuracy.

Indeed, Sam Bradford had it all, and the Eagles were lucky to have him – not to mention lucky to be rid of such a nondescript one-trick-pony as Nick Foles.

​For all who would listen, that was the pitch by the Hope Squad, be they so-called unbiased observers or hard-core fans.

Many bought it. Many, in fact, still do.

Why, I have no idea … and never will.

An inability to share my distaste for Bradford has never been an issue. Saw him play in college at Oklahoma and, Heisman or not, thought he was a dink-and-dunker all the way. He had the same “deer in headlights” look then, too. What Eagles fans are fearing when they see the team’s, ahem, leader right now is nothing new.

It was comical to see Sunday’s Inquirer with a full-page spread on the cover of its sports section, “unearthing” the futility of Bradford in passing the ball further than the length of a couch. Well, it’s not like the evidence was lacking, or brought up – I hammered away with it the moment the QB flip-flop with St. Louis occurred.
Westward went Foles with his 7.6 yards per attempt, being upgraded by Bradford’s 6.1 ypa. Um, that’s an upgrade?

Frankly, if you wanna pick at Foles and point at his flaws, be my guest. He has holes in his game, for sure. Just don’t point to Bradford as being a step up … or even one sideways. Foles’ career numbers blow away Bradford’s in every conceivable way, including the won-lost percentage.

​If you ask me, I’d take current backup Mark Sanchez ahead of Bradford in a second. Then again, I always would have.  

Picture
He was a no-doubter for me.

In a life that is putting the finishing touches on a fifth decade, four of them spent feeding a passion for football, rare is the individual who has come across the eyes behind these type-written words and caused a knee-jerk “can’t miss” reaction.

Green Bay quarterback Aaron Rodgers, though, was one. In fact, more than any other player I’ve seen grace the gridiron at a level beneath the NFL, he was “the one.”

Oh, other players caught my fancy more. Flutie. Herschel. Marino. Dorsett. The former remains, to me, the single greatest force in college football. But not necessarily a sure-fire pro. Size was the issue there. The latter three, no issues. They were gonna be Sunday players, it was just to what quality that was open for debate.

For me, with Rodgers, there was no debate.

Being a nut for college ball, I was privy to his wondrous talents more than a decade ago when he and Marshawn Lynch and their coach at Cal, Jeff Tedford, were making Pete Carroll’s dynastic Southern Cal squads sweat out their Pac-10 supremacy far more than most were aware. The Bears split two games against the Trojans with Rodgers at the helm of Tedford’s offense, but, frankly, he was far away the most impressive player on the field each time – a field which housed the likes of USC’s Matt Leinart, Reggie Bush and, of course, Lynch, his teammate.

Everything separated him, on individual and, even more so, collective terms. For instance, his arm was as strong as I’d seen, but with touch. Then you add the fact he could dissect a defense with his brain, and drain it with his legs, and, wow, I’d never seen that complete a package before – especially for a guy hoping to play at the next level.

Frankly, Michael Vick has the most physical gifts I’ve ever seen bestowed on a football player, never mind strictly a quarterback. But Rodgers had comparable ones, plus intangible and intellectual ones, pigskin wise, that Vick never had.

Honestly, I laughed when the “experts” tagged Leinart as the real QB star back in those days, the one destined for NFL greatness. The kid had size, sure, but he lacked arm strength. Big time. So, too, did the guy selected No. 1 in the 2005 NFL Draft: Alex Smith, whose “brainpower” was considered the driving force behind that choice.

Not for nothing, but the joke of that draft, which saw Rodgers fall to No. 24, was on full display Monday night, with Smith struggling to get anything right while Rodgers systematically picked apart Kansas City’s defense for 300-plus yards passing and five TDs.

The semantic debates now rage on, making sure to clarify that Rodgers may be the best in the game right at this moment, but that he can’t possibly be considered the best QB ever, not when current Patriots’ signal-caller Tom Brady already has four Super Bowl rings.

The team trophies raising an individual’s rank always has eluded me, but there is no denying Brady his due. If, indeed, Rodgers is No. 1 right now (and, by the way, he is and has been since 2008), then Brady is No. 1A.

Thing is, Brady hasn’t always played at the level he is playing now. Rodgers, pretty much, has since taking the reins from Brett Favre.

To me, Rodgers is the best now and the best that ever was. Better than Brady. Better than Montana. Better than Young. Better than Elway. Better than Marino.

It’s a no-doubter for me.

- Jack Kerwin  |  ydkjack1@gmail.com
0 Comments

Philly Phile  |  Kelly, surprisingly, shows he can improvise

9/28/2015

0 Comments

 

REALITY CHECK

Got it.

Darren Sproles is an electric, game-changing player with the football in his hands. In open space, in closed space, he can make people miss with the best of them.

His spark-plug size and fire-hydrant size make him, at once, difficult to see and difficult to bring down.

But, umm, can we cool it on how dominated Sunday’s game at MetLife Stadium.

No doubt, the 32-year-old vet made the play of the game, a career-long 89-yard punt return for a TD that gave the Birds a xx-0 lead. He also ran for another score.

All good. Heck, all great.

He has his flaws, though, and they even showed in this game … and they’re as relevant as his big-play ability is. Which is the “we want more Sproles” chants concern me.

The guy, really, is not an effective ballcarrier. Yes, he may rip off a 12-yarder or even a 52-yarder once in a while. But he has no business getting the ball on handoffs 11 times in a game, and the 17 yards he totaled off that many carries against the Jets is his norm in that regard, not the exception.


Sproles also ain’t Johnnie McSurehands. He ain’t the worst with catching passes. Not by a long shot. But he shouldn’t be a primary option, and he probably shouldn’t be an option at all on a wheel route – as Sunday’s drop on that perhaps cost the Eagles a TD.

Just a suggestion … why not get Kenyon Barner in there for that? Heck, why not get the youngster in there for rushing attempts, too?

I’m all for Sproles getting touches, certainly as a return man. But his value diminishes the more he has.

The fear here: Chip Kelly overuses the guy now, giving him carries that would better serve the Eagles longterm if they went to Ryan Matthews, DeMarco Murray, and, yeah, Barner, too, and then finds the tank empty when he really needs Sproles to change a game later on.
Picture
Gotta say, I’m impressed, if not flat-out surprised.

Chip Kelly can adapt. Maybe not in all-out, go-crazy, go-nuts, bail-on-previous-beliefs fashion, but the fact he can step back, admit his mistakes – at least to himself – and adjust his plan of attack and actually gameplan with his focus on the opposition instead of the bull-headed “they have to change for us” that has long been his ally, if not his undoing at times, was … well, frankly, monumental to me.

Scrapping so much of the read-option offense, forgoing the constant pulling of offensive linemen, utilizing not just the quarterback under center, but the running back in an “I” formation, all because it made sense with the Jets’ defense his Eagles were facing on Sunday, this was big stuff to me. Huge, really.

I didn’t know he had that in him.

If anything had defined Kelly since he arrived on the national scene as an offensive coordinator at the University of Oregon almost a decade ago, it was his arrogance, an unwavering arrogance that he knew better than you, better than me, better than anyone, including his fellow coaches and players … well, everything when it came to the game of football.

Play-calling, conditioning, teaching, training, preparing for an opponent, he felt, or came across that he felt, he knew it all best.

What an enlightening experience Sunday’s 24-17 win was for those of us who believed that.

Almost from the jump, this game, and Kelly’s gameplan, was different. On the third play from scrimmage for the Eagles’ offense, Ryan Matthews lined up in the “I,” a couple steps behind quarterback Sam Bradford, who happened to be crouched down behind center Jason Kelce.

Say what?!!

Truth be told, I don’t really have the issue with the Birds running out of the shotgun on every down. The QB, be it Bradford or anyone else, gets the ball quicker that way, with several yards between him and the closest defender – which is not quite the case when taking the snap old-school style.

Regardless, most people did have issue with that, at least the team’s absolute reliance on it, and they voiced that opinion. Now whether Kelly heard those complaints, or heeded them, is immaterial. The reality is, he looked at the failings of his offense at running the ball in the season’s first two weeks and determined that, hey, you know what, let’s get a different look. Let’s line up under center and run, if not power, then something close to it.

The end result: Matthews ripped off a 27-yard play that showcased his ability to read blocks, to explode through a hole, to run through tackles and to burst into the secondary.

The dude has game. Always has. Been a big fan since his days at Fresno State. Thought he was a better player than DeMarco Murray coming into the season, and a much better pickup when you consider price tags.

But I digress …

The big news, really, with that display, not to mention the entire contest, was Kelly’s adaptability. He made this game about the most important thing to a team that entered it 0-2: winning.

It wasn’t about displaying his genius, about how his style, his offense, his whole regime was going to revolutionize the NFL. It was about coming out alive and on top, regardless of how things looked.

Oh, and they looked ugly. A lot. The entire second half seemed to be a case of the Jets imploding every time they had the ball, with the Eagles pumping the breaks all along as their gas needle eked ever so close to empty.

It was a novel concept for Kelly. He doesn’t typically win games that fall far away from the “pretty” spectrum. Even at Oregon, if it a game was close and not particularly overflowing with fancy stuff, his Ducks were not likely to prevail. Of course, that didn’t happen very often.

At this level, it will … and the fact Kelly proved he could manage his team to victory in not-so-aesthetically-pleasing ways, even – gasp – trying to run out the clock for the entire fourth quarter, was, well, a revelation.

Kudos to him.

- Jack Kerwin  |  ydkjack1@gmail.com


0 Comments

MLB  |  Paps, Schmaps ... guy is a total hypocrite

9/28/2015

0 Comments

 
Don’t have a big problem with baseball players getting in heated arguments

With umpires, opposing players, coaches or managers. Even teammates.

No biggie to me. Not even if the verbal fisticuffs lead to some physical altercation.

But, the reason for the commotion has to be legit, and so does the initiating combatant.

Sorry, Jonathan Papelbon fans and proponents of his actions Sunday afternoon in D.C., but your boy fails miserably on both counts. If you need a visual, check it out.

Yeah, yeah, we get all the unwritten codes and how in-house policing works, But we’re not talking about a guy who follows either. He marches to his own drum, at all times, and that drum in solely and constantly banging for one reason, to promote himself. Period. End of story.

There is no wavering on that. If “Paps” surfaces outside of his own head, makes himself known in any way, there is but one rationale for it: attention.

The guy makes proclamations that NFL wide receivers are sports’ ultimate divas laughable, if not moot.

If you believe, truly believe, that Papelbon was righteous in what he did, calling out Bryce Harper and then putting a choke hold on the young MVP candidate when the latter responded in kind, because of some higher calling, like he was a beacon of sportsmanship sanity and, its ever-popular calling, right-hand calling card, “playing the game the right way,” well, bless your blinders-wearing, gullible soul.

Put it this way, the words “professional” and “Papelbon,” or any variation of it, should never cross paths and join in a united front, even in convoluted fashion.

Seriously, if Paps is your idea of a “team player” or someone willing to sacrifice himself for the good of the organization, start taking “reality check” classes. The guy was an all-out, only-for-Paps d-bag with the Red Sox, the Phillies and now Washington, where, not for nothing, the demise of the prohibitive NL East favorite into pathetic joke was pre-ordained the moment Nationals management traded for him.

A cancer has been used ad nauseam through the years to describe athletes detrimental to their team’s chances. No one identifies more with that than Paps.

The hilarity of this latest “look at me, look at me, LOOK AT MEEEEEE” exhibition by this mid-30s child is that while his complaint aimed at Harper, which contests that the superstar should give full effort in every circumstance, indeed, may have been legit if it came from someone else, it isn’t coming from someone who doesn’t do so himself.

How many times did Phillies fans, after witnessing another late-inning implosion, have to listen to this nincompoop babble on about how he just didn’t have it because the stakes weren’t high enough, that his juices weren’t flowing because the playoffs weren’t on the line? Ten, 15, 20 … does it even matter?

Paps, in what he did, showed what a hypocrite and weasel he is, and what dopes those who support what he did Sunday are.

The silliness that emanates from “those who really know,” with current and former ballplayers espousing old-school beliefs as if they’re gospel scripts that they truly follow at every juncture, the type that suggest Paps was, if anything, showing his teammate much-needed tough love and giving him an education in real baseball, reeks of a distaste for Harper than anything else.

Sorry, but this concept of locker rooms, especially baseball locker rooms, being the end-all, be-all of the hard edge in society, as if “the rest of us” cannot relate, may be the most comical thing ever hatched in the minds of hero-worshippers, not to mention the objects of that worship themselves.

Been in a lot of locker rooms, professional ones, in all the major sports, and there is nothing shared in there or stated in there that hasn’t seen life outside of locker rooms, and, frankly, you’d have to look far and wide to find a more pampered, babied, coddled lot than what resides in your typical, professional baseball locker room.

Paps AND Harper, at least their personalities, are byproducts of that whole deal, and Paps’ most recent attack … well, really, does he comes across as anything other than baseball’s version of a teenage girl throwing a tantrum for not getting enough likes or comments on a “selfie” she posted on whatever social media is most popular this second?

Not to me he doesn’t.

- Jack Kerwin  |  ydkjack1@gmail.com

0 Comments

College Football  |  5 takeaways from Illini’s 27-25 win vs. M. Tennessee

9/27/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
QB Wes Lunt needed 49 passing attempts Saturday to accumulate just 238 yards.
Picture
1. The shine officially is off Bill Cubit as head coach. Thrust into an awkward situation, with being handed the reins when Tim Beckman was fired a week before the season opener, Cubit raised hope with Illini Nation for 2015 and beyond by directing the team to an impressive demolition display covering the first two weeks that saw the Orange & Blue roll up 96 points and surrender just 3. The initial “ice to the face” awakening of what reality actually is right now hit with last week’s 48-14 loss at North Carolina. But, frankly, Saturday's win was more crushing to the psyche. Getting pounded on the scoreboard by a pretty talented power-5 school is one thing, but physically failing to overwhelm a non-power-5 one is another. MT didn’t out-scheme the host Illini in this one to stay close. It just stood toe to toe with a Big Ten foe, no problem, and would have won had a very makeable 43-yard FG not been hooked in the final minute.

2. The passing numbers are lame and attributed to QB Wes Lunt and his core of WRs, but, really, they belong to Cubit and his son and fellow play-calling czar, Ryan – neither of whom has met an aerial show they didn’t like, even if it were going backward. Against the Blue Raiders, Lunt started relatively hot and then cooled significantly. The fact he never reheated whatsoever following the team’s second series did nothing to derail the Cubits from calling 51 pass plays that dropped to 49 courtesy of the immobile Lunt being sacked twice. Before tossing an incompletion to end that second series of the day, Lunt was 7-for-10 for 92 yards and a TD. Starting with that misconnection, he went 22-for-39 the rest of the way for just 146 yards. That’s a measly 3.7 yards per attempt. That’s ridiculous. It’s not even worth throwing the ball if that’s all the yardage it yields, especially when the running game was averaging 4.6 yards per pop (36 carries for 167 yards) when Lunt wasn’t involved.

3. Speaking of the ground attack, the Cubits deserve some kudos for utilizing freshman Ke’Shawn Vaughn right out of the chute this season. One of the more ballyhooed prospects in Beckman’s final recruiting class, he is justifying all the talk with 52 carries, 227 yards and two TDs through four weeks as Josh Ferguson’s understudy. Though he doesn’t have the shake-and-back elusiveness of his senior mentor, Vaughn is slightly bigger and runs with a purpose, and the Illini benefitted greatly from his 13-carry, 80-yard effort Saturday that included an 8-yard TD late in the third quarter to push the hosts’ lead to 24-12. The Cubits, however, also deserve criticism for not relying on Vaughn, Ferguson and others running the ball when CLEARLY that part of the offense is working better than the passing game.

4. While placekicker Taylor Zalewski remains a hit-or-miss proposition, his 51-yard FG with 2:09 to play made this win possible. Honestly, his somewhat erratic tendency is not a major problem, but the defense getting torched for 330 yards by a Conference USA QB is. Brent Stockstill completed 29 of 42 passes, three of them going for scores, in process of piling up all that yardage. Frankly, he looked better than Lunt, and didn’t exactly look great, either. It was nice to see Dawuane Smoot get a couple sacks and LBs Mason Monheim and T.J. Neal combine for 27 tackles, but you almost have to discount the positives with this group because it allowed a lesser light to stay in the picture all game, not to mention drive downfield in the final minutes to put itself in a legit position to win. That’s not good. MT shouldn’t be within two TDs of the Illini, never mind two points. Furthermore, what does it say about the overall scheme AND performance of the D (and recruiting efforts) when its star player, Clayton Fejedelem, is a former walk-on and just racked up 12 tackles from the free safety spot?

5. Can’t say enough positives about the uniform combo selection. Seriously. It seems like two decades have passed since the Illini busted out the classic orange-blue-orange look, and it was great to see. The team looked sharp and tough, just in its gear. Now if its performance had matched the likes of say, Simeon Rice or Red Grange, it actually would have been sharp and tough. Regardless, the O-B-O at home is as “Illini” as the Illini can get, and it would be fantastic if they made that their staple attire at Memorial Stadium. The white-blue-white seen earlier this season was sharp, too, and the white-orange-white worn so often last season was decent, but O-B-O is the way to go. If nothing else, though, avoiding the all-white or all-orange getups would be most wise, although the jury is still out on an all-blue since it has yet to be unveiled, if, indeed, it ever were to be. Frankly, though not the biggest fan of Nike, which came up with the unis, or the “victory badge” it created to go with the rebrand, gotta give two thumbs to what it produced here. The Illini look great in many combos, even the ones not favored here.

- Jack Kerwin  | 
ydkjack1@gmail.com


0 Comments
<<Previous

    Categories

    NFL
    MLB
    NBA
    NHL
    NCAAFB
    ​NCAABB
    Eagles
    Phillies
    76ers
    Flyers
    Temple
    Villanova
    La Salle
    ​Saint Joe's
    ​Penn State

    Archives

    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Best of 2018

    Picture

    Best of 2017

    Picture

    Best of 2016

    Picture

    Best of 2015

    Picture

    RSS Feed

Picture
Your source for insight ... or insanity

GET TO KNOW YDKJ

ABOUT    |    CONTACT   |    BLOG    |    PRIVACY POLICY

​© COPYRIGHT 2018   YDKJ   |   Terms & Conditions
Picture